SUPPORT OUR JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION TO THE HIGH COURT AGAINST THE REFUSAL OF YVETTE COOPER MP, THE HOME SECRETARY, TO SET UP A PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO OFFICIAL COLLUSION WITH THE PAKISTANI MUSLIM CHILD RAPE GANGS!
The Home Secretary has been repeatedly asked to exercise her statutory powers to order a public inquiry into the dereliction of duty to protect English girls by police, social workers, council workers, local councillors and national politicians.
The Home Secretary's improper refusal to agree to this, it will be argued, was to protect their current and former Labour Party colleagues, with a view to denying the compiling of evidence which would allow Labour politicians, in particular, to be sued for their misconduct in public office and for their generally appalling dereliction of their duties.
It will be asserted that this dereliction of duty was politically motivated, not only from the point of view of political advantage, but also as part of their ideological support for the British official policies both of inadequately regulated mass immigration and of State imposed multi-culturalism. These are legally irrelevant considerations which should not have influenced the thinking of Ms Cooper in dealing with any of the many requests for a statutory inquiry.
In the circumstances it is clear that the on-going refusal to set up of a public statutory national inquiry has not been properly decided according to law by the Home Secretary in the exercise of her statutory powers. This refusal can therefore be legally challenged in the High Court by Judicial Review and be ordered to be reversed and a statutory Inquiry ordered.
The Labour Government’s deflection stratagem of urging local Inquires is no answer to the requirement of a national statutory Inquiry.
SUPPORT OUR JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION TO THE HIGH COURT AGAINST THE REFUSAL OF YVETTE COOPER MP, THE HOME SECRETARY, TO SET UP A PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO OFFICIAL COLLUSION WITH THE PAKISTANI MUSLIM CHILD RAPE GANGS!
The Home Secretary has been repeatedly asked to exercise her statutory powers to order a public inquiry into the dereliction of duty to protect English girls by police, social workers, council workers, local councillors and national politicians.
The Home Secretary's improper refusal to agree to this, it will be argued, was to protect their current and former Labour Party colleagues, with a view to denying the compiling of evidence which would allow Labour politicians, in particular, to be sued for their misconduct in public office and for their generally appalling dereliction of their duties.
It will be asserted that this dereliction of duty was politically motivated, not only from the point of view of political advantage, but also as part of their ideological support for the British official policies both of inadequately regulated mass immigration and of State imposed multi-culturalism. These are legally irrelevant considerations which should not have influenced the thinking of Ms Cooper in dealing with any of the many requests for a statutory inquiry.
In the circumstances it is clear that the on-going refusal to set up of a public statutory national inquiry has not been properly decided according to law by the Home Secretary in the exercise of her statutory powers. This refusal can therefore be legally challenged in the High Court by Judicial Review and be ordered to be reversed and a statutory Inquiry ordered.
The Labour Government’s deflection stratagem of urging local Inquires is no answer to the requirement of a national statutory Inquiry.
