Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

News

Brawl shuts down London tube station

Cops scrambled to South Harrow Underground Station after a mass brawl broke out and “reports of a teenage male being stabbed multiple times” at 6.24pm on Monday night. 


WHAT MEDIA BLACKOUT TELLS US ABOUT BREXIT

What emerges from the silence of the main stream media is the deafening sound of an old world disintegrating.

 


ISIS Bride Given Taxpayer Funded Legal Aid

Shamima Begum - the runaway Jihadi bride and alleged ISIS enforcer - is set to be granted legal aid to fight for her rescinded UK citizenship.


This Day in History - 16th April

On this day in 1746, Charles Edward Stuart (Bonnie Prince Charlie) was defeated at the Battle of Culloden Moor by an English Army under the the command of William, Duke of Cumberland.


"Artist" Jailed for Kidnap and Torture of Teen

Five members of a notorious London gang have been handed jail sentences for the kidnapping and torture of a 16-year-old boy.


ISIS Bride was part of Religious "Police"

ISIS bride Shamima Begum was not the mere “housewife” she claimed to be, but a member of the Islamic state's terrifying religious Police.


David Lammy calls for Amnesty for Illegals

Labour’s David Lammy has called for an amnesty for hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants living in the united Kingdom.


English Democrats v UK Gov

ENGLISH DEMOCRATS – CLAIM FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE UNITED KINGDOM LEFT THE EUROPEAN UNION ON 29TH MARCH 2019

PRESS RELEASE

On 2nd April the English Democrats, the English nationalist political party, issued a judicial review claiming the Prime Minister could not lawfully agree to an extension to the period before the United Kingdom could leave the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. The Court is asked to declare that, because she had no such power, the UK automatically left the EU on 29th March – the original ‘exit day’, two years after notification was made.

This challenge was to the extension offered by the EU on 27.3.2019 and accepted by the PM on 28th March not to the additional extension the PM claimed to agree to today (11th April).

Attached are submissions filed in support of the challenge. The Government is expected to reply by 17th April.

The English Democrats’ case is that the PM has no statutory power to agree to an extension. The change to ‘exit day’, in a statutory instrument under the European Union Withdrawal Act 2018, can only be made if the Article 50 period has already been extended under international law. If the PM had no power to extend, Parliament could not lawfully make the statutory instrument.

The English Democrats rely on the Supreme Court decision in Miller v Secretary of State, which found that the government cannot change how and whether EU law applies to the UK by the Royal Prerogative. The PM could only notify under Article 50 under the EU (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. The inevitable result was that the UK would leave the EU after two years, when EU law would cease to apply to the UK. Any extension would change the law by making EU law apply beyond that date, which the Act did not give the PM the power to do.

In addition, the English Democrats’ case (also relying on Miller) is that an agreement to extend the Article 50 period would frustrate the purpose of the 2017 and 2018 Acts; particularly as there is no restriction on the length of any potential extension and the number of extensions that may be requested – as the latest extension has shown.

The ‘Cooper-Letwin’ Act giving Parliament power over extension requests has no effect, as no further extension could be given if the UK had already left the EU by the time it came into law.

The English Democrats rely on the Wightman decision of the European Court of Justice in support of our contention that, under EU law, the PM can only agree to an extension ‘on behalf of the UK’ if she has the constitutional authority to do so. Therefore, the UK left the EU on 29th March under EU as well as UK law.

Former Court of Appeal judge, Sir Richard Aikens, has said the English Democrats’ argument is at least ‘highly arguable’, see https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6882583/Former-appeal-judge-says-legality-Brexit-extension-tested-court.html.

Solicitor Robin Tilbrook, who is the Chairman of the English Democrats, said that:

“The good news for all those who voted Leave is that we could already be Out of the EU without being saddled with Theresa May’s appallingly bad deal! The challenge to Leave supporters is that this case is our best and maybe our only chance of actually getting out of the EU. This means that we must win it at all costs! I therefore appeal to all Leave supporters to put all differences aside and to unite in supporting this case”

The claim is being crowd-funded and donations can be made here: https://www.englishdemocrats.party/donate

The English Democrats’ Submissions in full have been published here: https://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/2019/04/detailed-submissions-in-re-queen-on.html

Please contact Robin Tilbrook with any queries:-

Robin Tilbrook

Chairman,

The English Democrats


Former appeal judge says legality of Brexit extension SHOULD be tested

A former appeal judge has said the legality of Theresa May's delay to Brexit should be tested in a court.

Sir Richard Aikens, who sat in the Court of Appeal from 2008 until 2015, spoke after the leader of the English Democrats political party launched a legal battle claiming that the UK has already left the EU. 

Britain was supposed to leave on March 29, but was granted an extension by the EU until April 12 at a meeting last in Brussels last month.

But The English Democrats leader Robin Tilbrook, as well as number of Tory Brexiteers, says the new exit date should have gone before the House of Commons and the House of Lords before it was approved.


-->